Referee Expert Questions Valverde’s Early Strike: Should It Have Counted Against Atletico Madrid?

Key moments and decisions

Real Madrid defeated Atletico Madrid 2-1 in the Spanish Super Cup semi-final, edging the city rival and advancing to the final against Barcelona amid several controversial refereeing calls.

The central talking point was Fede Valverde’s early goal from a direct free kick, a moment some observers argued came after a prior foul that should have been whistled. The on-field official showed a yellow to an Atletico player, and the VAR did not overturn the decision, leaving the goal intact.

Another flashpoint involved a tense challenge by Gonzalo García on an Atletico opponent. Some observers believed the foul merited a red card, but the referee opted for a yellow and VAR did not intervene to change the call.

Atlético Madrid also had a goal by Alexander Sørloth reviewed for a potential infringement by Sørloth on Raúl Asensio. After the review, officials ruled no violation and the goal stood, briefly giving Atlético a 1-2 scoreline.

Post-match commentary featured former international referee Iturralde González telling Cadena SER that there was no foul on Jude Bellingham and suggesting that Madrid’s opener may have stemmed from an earlier refereeing error. Real Madrid’s victory kept them on course for the final with Barcelona, while supporters and pundits debated the officiating long after the final whistle.

The match also carried broadcast and commercial notes, including exclusive coverage arrangements via a streaming app, reflecting the modern media footprint of major cup ties.

Punchlines coming up, because we all know a controversial decision deserves its own highlight reel.

Punchline 1: If refereeing were a sniper, the target would be precision—and sometimes the bullet just wings the truth. Boom, replay welcome.

Punchline 2: If VAR had a motto, it would be “Slow motion, fast conclusions”—great for suspense, not so great for fans with popcorn allergies.