Aballou: A site made by fans, for fans

When Headlines Fire First: Barcelona’s Fury as Madrid Hints at Negreira Case in Clasico Fallout

29 October 2025

When Headlines Fire First: Barcelona’s Fury as Madrid Hints at Negreira Case in Clasico Fallout
Barça confronts fresh controversy as Negreira echoes resurface around the Clasico

Tensions rise as Madrid hints about the Negreira case during Clasico spark Barça backlash

A wave of anger swept through Barcelona after hints from Real Madrid, specifically from some players, regarding the "Negreira case" that remains under judicial investigation, which was brought back up under the pretext of the latest Clasico between the rivals.

The Catalan club believes what Madrid players said crossed the line, while Barcelona officials struggle to understand the media double standard in handling statements from players on both sides.

According to the Spanish newspaper Mundo Deportivo, Barcelona officials considered that Real Madrid members used the Clasico atmosphere to relaunch discussions about the Negreira case, provoking significant discontent within the club, especially since the case is sub judice and should not be used as a media lever to sway public opinion.

Criticism of Barça also followed what the club saw as an unjust media campaign against the young talent Lamine Yamal due to his humorous comments about Real Madrid during the Kings League, while Real Madrid players’ statements did not trigger substantial controversy despite being made on official platforms or during matches.

Belgian goalkeeper Thibaut Courtois spoke last Tuesday before Real Madrid’s match against Juventus in the Champions League, indirectly criticizing Barcelona president Joan Laporta for his reference to the “white hand” arbitration.

Courtois said in a press conference under UEFA: "That talk is connected to the Negreira case and everything related to it," adding: "I have never seen anything like that; on the contrary, I don’t feel we benefited from refereeing at any moment."

During the Clasico itself, Movistar+ cameras captured Real Madrid’s Jude Bellingham shouting at referee Cesar Soto Grado: "Even with Negreira!" after a foul against Pedri, then mocking his rival’s complaint by placing his hands on his neck and laughing.

Conversely, Barça, according to the report, feels there is a deliberate "persecution" campaign against Lamine Yamal, with his lighthearted remarks amplified, while Real Madrid players are allowed to direct direct criticisms toward the Catalan club in UEFA press conferences or during matches without triggering media backlash.

This controversy comes as Barça remains angered by refereeing in the latest Clasico, which the club says again went against them in all controversial moments, including the penalty that VAR overturned after ruling that Vinícius had committed the foul on Lamine Yamal rather than the other way around, even though the on-field referee had awarded it to Barcelona.

Despite these events, Movistar Madrid TV maintained that the White team was the victim of referee decisions, a stance the paper described as a fixed position by Madrid media; it noted there has never been an admission of any refereeing bias in any match against Barcelona.

A thorny issue

The Negreira case stands as one of the most controversial in modern Spanish football, amid suspicions involving Barcelona’s ties to former referee Jose Maria Negreira, who served as deputy head of the Spanish refereeing committee from 1994 to 2018.

The case first surfaced publicly in February 2023, when Spanish reports revealed a company owned by Negreira had received substantial payments from Barcelona totaling around 7 million euros over several years, described at the time as "technical consulting related to refereeing." These payments continued until 2018, prompting questions about potential influence on decisions by referees in the club’s matches during that period.

The club did not deny the transactions but said they aimed at obtaining technical reports to help players understand Spanish refereeing styles, denying any intention to influence referees or manipulate results. Nevertheless, the Spanish public prosecutor opened a formal investigation, charging Barça with "sports corruption," "misuse of funds," and "document forgery."

Negreira himself, in his initial statements, admitted receiving the money but said it was not to buy referees but to ensure "referee neutrality" toward Barça, a justification that sparked more doubt and criticism in sports and media circles. The investigation also included several former Barça officials, including former presidents Josep Maria Bartomeu and Sandro Rosell, as well as club financial executives.

The affair has deeply polarized Spanish football, with Real Madrid and others using the moment to level sharp criticisms at Barça and demand official clarifications from the Spanish federation and UEFA. As a result, UEFA opened its own independent probe to assess possible European sanctions against Barça, before eventually allowing the team to participate in the Champions League while the Spanish investigations continue.

Punchline time: Aim small, miss small. And as for headlines—In football, the only thing that always stays on target is a good press conference.

Author

Avatar

Emma Amme

I am Emma Amme, an English sports journalist born in 1998. Passionate about astronomy, contemporary dance, and handcrafted woodworking, I share my sensitive view of sports.

Frequently Asked Questions

What sparked Barcelona’s anger during the Clasico?

Barça reacted to Real Madrid players hinting at the Negreira case, which is still under judicial investigation and was brought up again around the Clasico.

Which players or officials are named in the controversy?

References are made to Jude Bellingham, Thibaut Courtois, Lamine Yamal, and former Barça officials such as Josep Maria Bartomeu and Sandro Rosell, among others.

What is the Negreira case about?

It involves alleged payments from Barcelona to a company owned by former referee Jose Maria Negreira, raising questions about referee neutrality and possible sports corruption.