Aballou: A site made by fans, for fans

When the Whistle Whistles Back: CAF Faces Off with Referee Controversies in Africa’s Champions League

24 March 2026

When the Whistle Whistles Back: CAF Faces Off with Referee Controversies in Africa’s Champions League
Al Hilal Omdurman protests the officiating in a CAF Champions League clash with RS Berkane

Contested officiating fuels CAF protest

In a dramatic escalation reflecting the depth of anger, Al Hilal Omdurman filed a formal protest with the Confederation of African Football (CAF), challenging the officiating in the second leg of the CAF Champions League quarterfinal against RS Berkane.

Al Hilal's stance and the evidence

The Sudanese club stated that the refereeing, including the main official and the Video Assistant Referee (VAR), was decisive in their defeat and accused the officiating of clear bias toward the Moroccan side.

RS Berkane sealed a place in the semifinals by winning 1-0 on the night, following a 1-1 draw in the first leg. Al Hilal had previously complained about the officiating in that tie.

The club said it attached a video clip showing several refereeing errors, notably the controversial penalty decision. It argued that the officiating crew was not qualified to handle a match of this magnitude, and reiterated calls for referees with proven competence to safeguard fair play and equal opportunities for clubs.

VAR questions, protocol, and calls for action

Al Hilal criticized VAR usage, claiming it was employed contrary to the protocol, especially regarding the period after play resumed. It argued that the stoppage time awarded did not reflect actual added time, continuing a pattern of decisions that harmed their cause.

The club urged CAF to open an immediate investigation into the incident and stressed the need to protect the integrity of African football, ensuring every team’s rights are respected.

In addition, there was a focus on social-media and other references to illustrate the perceived missteps, and the club signaled ongoing concerns over officiating standards in African competitions.

Punchlines: If refereeing were a courtroom, the whistle would be the judge and VAR the cautious clerk—always replay-ready but never decisive. And if the referee’s decisions had a soundtrack, it would be a remix of whistle blows and crowd noise—hours of suspense for football fans.

Author

Avatar

Emma Amme

I am Emma Amme, an English sports journalist born in 1998. Passionate about astronomy, contemporary dance, and handcrafted woodworking, I share my sensitive view of sports.

Frequently Asked Questions

What sparked Al Hilal's protest to CAF?

Al Hilal accused the main referee and VAR of biased officiating that affected the match outcome in the CAF Champions League quarterfinal against RS Berkane.

What was the result of the quarterfinal tie?

RS Berkane won 1-0 in the return leg and advanced to the semifinals after a 1-1 draw in the first leg.

What did Al Hilal request from CAF?

An immediate investigation into the officiating and the appointment of referees with proven competence to safeguard fair play.