Penalty Debate: Syria's Claim Against Morocco in Arab Cup 2025 Quarterfinals
11 December 2025
Video verdict by a renowned referee
\nSoccer analyst and former Egyptian referee Gamal Al-Ghandour settled the debate over Syria's penalty claim against Morocco in the Arab Cup 2025 quarterfinals in Qatar.
\nSyria appealed after Mahmoud Al-Aswad went down in the box in the 24th minute following contact with Moroccan defender Marouane Saadan. The referee consulted VAR but ruled no foul.
\nHowever, Al-Ghandour, speaking on Abu Dhabi Sports, argued the incident warranted a penalty, noting the Moroccan defender never touched the ball and clearly fouled the Syrian attacker.
\nThe expert added: The ball was in the Syria striker's possession; he touched it first, then went down after the challenge. The foul occurred inside the box clearly.
\nAl-Ghandour also noted a paradox: the same official had earlier awarded a similar non-call against Syria in the midfield after Mahmoud Al Mawas was fouled.
\n\nWhat the experts say
\nBeyond the refereeing debate, Arab Cup organizers will watch how video reviews influence momentum and fan sentiment as the tournament proceeds in Qatar.
\nSome analysts say such calls could swing quarterfinals in tight matches, while others insist VAR should assist, not replace, on-pitch drama.
\n\nPunchline: If the video review is the judge, even the coffee breaks should be budgeted.
\nPunchline 2: The whistle may win debates, but it still can't locate a rogue ball in the box without a little help from technology.