Aballou: A site made by fans, for fans

Clash of the Saudi Clasico: Was Al Ahli's Penalty Claim Legit?

2 February 2026

Clash of the Saudi Clasico: Was Al Ahli's Penalty Claim Legit?
Saudi Clasico sparks penalty debate as experts weigh in.

Late Penalty Claim in the Saudi Clasico

A refereeing expert weighed in on whether Al Ahli Jeddah deserved a penalty during the classic showdown with their archrivals, Al Hilal, in the Roshn Saudi Pro League.

Match Context and Expert Insight

Al Ahli and Al Hilal were level at 0-0 when they met at Kingdom Arena on Monday, in round 20 of the Roshn Saudi Pro League.

In stoppage time of the second half, Al Ahli players argued for a spot-kick, claiming Firas Al-Breikan was fouled by Hamad Al-Yami inside the box.

However, the refereeing expert Nawaf Shukrallah said Al Ahli did not deserve a penalty in that moment, backing the referee's decision to restart the match normally.

Shukrallah told Saudi Sports Channels that there was competitive contact and a natural clash between players, and there was no foul by the Hilal player; in fact, the Al Ahli player initiated contact, and restarting play was the correct call.

Punchline 1: If penalties were donuts, this match would be a bakery.

Punchline 2: Even VAR would need a coffee break after this one.

Author

Avatar

Emma Amme

I am Emma Amme, an English sports journalist born in 1998. Passionate about astronomy, contemporary dance, and handcrafted woodworking, I share my sensitive view of sports.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did Al Ahli deserve a penalty in the Clasico?

No. The expert Nawaf Shukrallah said there was no foul by the opposing player and the call to restart was correct.

What was the match result?

The game ended 0-0 at Kingdom Arena.

Who commented on the decision?

Referee expert Nawaf Shukrallah spoke to Saudi Sports Channels detailing the assessment.