Aballou: A site made by fans, for fans

Controversial Penalty Admission Shakes Saudi Pro League: Al Nassr vs Neom Under Scrutiny

18 November 2025

Controversial Penalty Admission Shakes Saudi Pro League: Al Nassr vs Neom Under Scrutiny
Cristiano Ronaldo converts a penalty as debate swirls over a controversial call in the Saudi Pro League.

Referees Admit Controversial Penalty in Al Nassr vs Neom

In a surprising turn, the Saudi Main Referees Committee and the Arbitration Department acknowledged that the penalty awarded to Al Nassr in their Roshen Pro League clash with Neom was not valid.

The match, played on November 8, finished 3-1 in favor of Al Nassr, with Cristiano Ronaldo scoring the second goal in the 65th minute amid controversy.

The decision to award the spot kick sparked wide debate among analysts, some arguing the contact did not justify a penalty, while others defended the on-field call and VAR involvement.

According to the Saudi refereeing authorities, the penalty decision was not correct and was not supported as a valid ruling in the proceedings of the gathering.

Interestingly, the report notes that another penalty awarded to Al Nassr against Al-Fayha, during stoppage time by referee Mohammed Al-Huwaish, caused substantial controversy but was not discussed at the meeting.

During the Dammam conference, 49 referees attended, including 25 officials on the field, 24 assistants, and three female referees who participate in the women’s league matches.

Renowned match official Gamal Al-Ghandour stated that the key decisions in the notable moments of the game were correct, while other experts offered mixed views on the decision’s legitimacy.

Despite the controversy, the article notes that Al Nassr continued their strong form in domestic competition and in the AFC Champions League group stage, extending their winning streak.

In the broader context, the report mentions ongoing debates among refereeing experts, with differing opinions on the penalties and disciplinary actions observed in the match.

As the conference concluded in Dammam, the focus remained on applying the laws of the game and improving VAR processes, with 49 referees receiving theoretical and practical sessions.

Overall, the authorities confirmed that the decision related to the Al Nassr–Neom incident was reviewed and deemed not accurate, reinforcing the ongoing dialogue about officiating standards in Saudi football.

Punchline time: If officiating were a sniper’s sport, tonight’s act would be a headshot on a shadowy line—clearly visible, but somehow still controversial. Punchline 2: I asked VAR for a moral compass; it handed me a red card and a playlist called “Replays.”

Author

Avatar

Emma Amme

I am Emma Amme, an English sports journalist born in 1998. Passionate about astronomy, contemporary dance, and handcrafted woodworking, I share my sensitive view of sports.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did the Main Referees Committee admit the penalty was invalid?

Yes, the committee and the Arbitration Department stated that the penalty call in the Al Nassr vs Neom match was not correct.

What was the match result and who scored Ronaldo’s goal?

Al Nassr won 3-1 against Neom, with Cristiano Ronaldo scoring the second goal in the 65th minute.

Which experts weighed in on the decision?

Experts including Gamal Al-Ghandour and Fahd Al-Mardasi provided opposing viewpoints on the call, reflecting ongoing debate among refereeing specialists.

Where was the referees’ conference held and what did it cover?

The conference took place in Dammam and focused on game laws, practical drills, and VAR applications, with 49 referees in attendance.