Aballou: A site made by fans, for fans

Penalty Referee Controversy Shocks Neom as Al Hilal Seizes Lead 2-1

18 January 2026

Penalty Referee Controversy Shocks Neom as Al Hilal Seizes Lead 2-1
Neom protest over a controversial non-penalty call against Al Hilal

Match outcome and the penalty claim

A controversial refereeing decision in a win for The Leader.

An officiating expert said Neom deserved a penalty in the Saudi Pro League clash with Al Hilal, but the referee did not award it.

Neom lost to Al Hilal 1-2, at King Khalid Stadium in Tabuk, in round 16 of the Roshen League.

Former Egyptian referee Mohamed Kamal Risha told Al-Riyadia: 'In the 72nd minute, Neom should have had a penalty'.

He added: 'Said Benrahma was clearly held by Pablo Mari; the video review should have intervened'.

Notably, Al Hilal sealed the win after Ruben Neves's penalty in the 66th minute.

Penalty calls: because even the VAR needs a coffee break.

And yes, the whistle still gets more action than my gym cardio.

Author

Avatar

Emma Amme

I am Emma Amme, an English sports journalist born in 1998. Passionate about astronomy, contemporary dance, and handcrafted woodworking, I share my sensitive view of sports.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened in the 72nd minute?

Experts say Neom should have been awarded a penalty in the 72nd minute, but it was not given.

What was the final score?

Al Hilal won 2-1.

Which players are mentioned in connection with the incident?

Said Benrahma, Pablo Mari, and Ruben Neves are cited; Neves scored the second goal for Al Hilal.