Aballou: A site made by fans, for fans

Red Hat, Realities, and Referees: Infantino Sparks a Neutrality Debate

20 February 2026

Red Hat, Realities, and Referees: Infantino Sparks a Neutrality Debate
Infantino at the Washington meeting amid a debate on political neutrality.

Background

FIFA president Gianni Infantino found himself at the center of a wide controversy after taking part in a Peace Council meeting in Washington, chaired by U.S. President Donald Trump.

The questions grew over whether this participation aligned with FIFA's political neutrality rules in its ethics code.

The session marked the launch of the council, described as a new international body potentially alternative to the United Nations amid frequent criticism of the United States government toward the U.N.

The Debate and Rules

Infantino announced a genuine partnership between FIFA and the Peace Council, and outlined ambitions to develop football infrastructure projects in Gaza.

Yet the debate sharpened after a video circulated showing Infantino wearing a red cap bearing the USA logo, a symbol critics said signaled political intent potentially violating neutrality.

FIFA's ethics code Article 15 requires officials to maintain political neutrality in relations with governments and organizations, in line with the federation's principles and aims.

Additionally, Article 14 calls for avoiding conduct that could raise suspicions of misdeeds or conflicts of interest.

Laws also state that a violation could trigger a fine up to 10,000 Swiss francs about $11,400 and suspension from football activities for up to two years.

So far there has been no clear determination whether Infantino's participation violated those rules, and FIFA has not issued an official statement.

Outlook and Context

The developments come as Infantino works closely with the U.S. administration in preparation for the 2026 World Cup finals to be hosted by the United States, Mexico, and Canada.

Kristi Coventry, head of the International Olympic Committee, said she would review whether Infantino's status as an IOC member complies with the rules or constitutes a potential violation due to his presence in the American president's new council.

In the background, officials emphasize safeguarding the sport's integrity and remind everyone that the spectacle of football thrives on unity, not headlines.

Punchline: If neutrality were a player, FIFA would bench it for arguing with the referee.

Punchline: And if hats could vote, that red cap would get a red card for signaling politics.

Author

Avatar

Michael Whooosh

I am Michael Whooosh, an English sports journalist born in 1986. Passionate about surfing, poetry, and beekeeping, I share my human and sensitive view of sports.

Frequently Asked Questions

What sparked the controversy around Infantino's Washington visit?

Infantino's participation in a Peace Council meeting chaired by Trump raised questions about neutrality under FIFA's ethics rules.

What do FIFA's ethics rules say about neutrality and conduct?

Article 15 requires neutrality in relations with governments and organizations; Article 14 warns against misconduct or conflicts of interest.

How does this relate to the 2026 World Cup?

The discussion comes as the U.S.-led bid for the 2026 World Cup progresses, with implications for FIFA's stance on politics and neutrality.

Has FIFA issued a formal statement?

As of now, FIFA has not released an official position on the matter.