Aballou: A site made by fans, for fans

Shocking Leaks: Laporta, Enrique, and Valverde Speak Out in the Nigerira Case

16 December 2025

Shocking Leaks: Laporta, Enrique, and Valverde Speak Out in the Nigerira Case
Audios reveal three Barça voices amid the Nigerira case

Key Revelations

New audio leaks in the Nigerira affair reveal the testimony of FC Barcelona president Joan Laporta, along with the club’s former coaches Luis Enrique and Ernesto Valverde.

Cadena SER aired clips suggesting neither Enrique nor Valverde were aware of arbitration reports or of the club’s dealings with Maria Niegrera, the former deputy head of the referees committee, during their tenures.

Laporta also denies knowledge of the deputy head or his son being involved in the case, stating he was not informed about the reports or any documents related to referees.

Responses from Barça Figures

Valverde is quoted as saying he never used such reports, never requested them, and was not briefed on them at Barcelona; he notes that in Bilbao his assistants may receive them, but he was never told about these services or related documents.

He also points out that some clubs hire arbitration consultants, citing Athletic Bilbao as an example, but emphasizes he was never informed at Barcelona about such services or shown any related documents.

Enrique adds that he does not recall being offered or using these reports and that he did not engage with them during his time with Barça or at his current club.

Barça’s Defense and Broader Context

Laporta defends payments to firms linked to Niegrera as decisions rooted in past boards, argued to have benefited the club and to be part of ongoing operations rather than a constructed mechanism to influence competition.

He maintains that the reports were produced by Niegrera’s son, a claim contested by the son himself, who denies involvement and disputes the narrative forwarded by the club’s leadership.

Laporta stresses Barça never intended to manipulate results, framing the case as an attempt to undermine the club’s achievements during a successful era that has elevated Barça onto the world stage.

He concludes that the club faced a coordinated campaign to damage its reputation and that more context will emerge as investigations progress.

Punchline time: If Barca’s drama were a match, the whistle would be used for a parade, not a foul. If leaks paid the bills, this article would need a bigger end-credit scene than a blockbuster.

Author

Avatar

Michael Whooosh

I am Michael Whooosh, an English sports journalist born in 1986. Passionate about surfing, poetry, and beekeeping, I share my human and sensitive view of sports.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do the leaks reveal about Laporta’s knowledge of the refereeing consultants?

The leaks suggest Laporta claimed not to have been informed about the specific reports or about any related dealings, arguing such matters predated his presidency.

Did Enrique or Valverde acknowledge involvement with the Nigerira case?

Both coaches deny involvement and assert they were not briefed on or did not use any reports connected to the referees or NiGerira’s advisory network.

What is the broader takeaway for Barça from these leaks?

The club contends the payments and reports are legacy decisions, while critics view the saga as a targeted effort to tarnish Barça’s reputation during a successful period.