World Cup Chaos and Presidential Plot Twists: How Trump Complicated 2026

Travel and Visa Hurdles

Organizing the World Cup is never easy, but when the host is President Donald Trump, the picture gets even more tangled. In just six months, the United States, joined by Mexico and Canada, will host the largest edition in the tournament's history. It’s a logistical feat that promises spectacle, but also the kind of bureaucratic tango that would make a bureaucrat dance the macarena.

Although the joint hosting was intended to reflect high-level coordination among three nations, Trump’s controversial policies have stirred tensions with neighbors, created political strain, and raised concerns that some matches might be moved. At the same time, visa restrictions remain a constant headache for fans and teams alike.

Visa Scrutiny and Security Steps

Normally, obtaining a U.S. visa takes weeks or months, but Trump announced a special fast-track for World Cup ticket holders, promising quicker interview slots. However, officials stressed that a ticket is not a visa and does not bypass standard security checks, even if it buys a shortcut in the appointment line.

By June, the administration’s travel rules had expanded to cover additional countries, complicating entry for fans and teams from some nations involved in the tournament. The political climate has cast a shadow over the fan experience, with heightened scrutiny and long waits still a reality for many travelers.

Getty Images

Threats to Move Matches and Neighborly Tensions

Trump has repeatedly floated the possibility of relocating games away from cities under Democratic control, citing security concerns. The cities most often named include Boston (7 matches), San Francisco (6), Seattle (6), and Los Angeles (8). A relocation would be a logistical nightmare—conflicting contracts, altered travel plans, and real headaches for FIFA, broadcasters, and fans who already booked flights and hotels.

Contracts with host cities cannot be terminated easily, except in major disasters, and organizers would have to juggle schedules and rebook venues. The presence of the National Guard in several cities, invoked to combat crime and alleged domestic unrest, further complicates the security landscape around the event.

Immigration raids and aggressive enforcement in key locales, including Los Angeles, have intensified fears in Latino communities and raised concerns about the tournament’s atmosphere. Officials warn that enforcement campaigns could persist up to and during the tournament, potentially affecting the experience for visitors and participants alike.

Tension with Neighbors

Behind the headlines, Canada and Mexico have not gained special political leverage from hosting duties. U.S. foreign policy under Trump has continued to strain relations with allies and adversaries alike. Tariffs on Canadian goods and hints at broader actions against Mexican interests have fed a climate of uncertainty as the three-nation co-host unfolds on the world stage.

These tensions add to the challenges of staging the first World Cup across three nations, with 48 teams, in what is described as the largest and most logistically complex edition to date.

Punchlines are on the way: if chaos were a sport, this World Cup would already be crowned champion. And if the president’s plan is to keep us guessing, at least the schedule will provide ample material for pundits and memes alike.